Improvement in Quality of Life of Postmenopausal Women with Depression with commonly used Antidepressants (Escitalopram vs. Desvenlafaxine): A Randomized Controlled Trial in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital of North India.

Introduction: The postmenopausal symptoms affect the quality of life (QoL) of women. Depression and anxiety too have been associated with diminished QoL. It is known that antidepressants escitalopram and desvenlafaxine are effective in the treatment of depression and anxiety. However, to the best of our knowledge, their comparative effect on the QoL of postmenopausal women with depression and anxiety has not been studied in the Indian setup. Materials and Methods: The present study was a randomized, intention to treat, open-label trial undertaken in North India's a tertiary care teaching hospital. Postmenopausal women attending the psychiatry outpatient department and newly diagnosed with depression and anxiety were randomized in two groups to receive Tab. Escitalopram 10-20 mg and Tab. Desvenlafaxine 50-100 mg. Their QoL was assessed using the WHOQOL BREF scale at baseline, 3 weeks and 6 weeks. Results: Escitalopram was observed to be statistically better than desvenlafaxine in improving the overall QoL score of the WHOQOL-BREF scale. Individually, escitalopram significantly improved the scores of the physical health domain, psychological and environmental domains except for the social relationship domain. Desvenlafaxine significantly improved scores of all four domains. Conclusion: Escitalopram was observed to be significantly better than desvenlafaxine in improving the overall QoL scores. Both the drugs were well tolerated.

Efficacy, tolerability and safety of perampanel in population with pharmacoresistant focal seizures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Focal seizures are associated with various co-morbidities. Seizure disorders also affect the quality of life of the patients. A huge proportion of patients continue to have uncontrolled seizures despite the availability of numerous antiepileptic drugs. Novel therapeutic targets too, have failed to overcome this problem. Therefore, drugs acting on conventional targets are being explored. Perampanel is one such drug. The present study aimed to assess its efficacy, safety, and effect on quality of life and cognition in patients aged 12 years and above. METHODS: Database search was conducted using keywords perampanel, partial seizures and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Single and double blinded RCTs were included in the analysis. The primary outcomes assessed were 50% responder rate and seizure freedom rates. Secondary outcomes assessed were Improvement in Clinical Global Improvement for Change (CGI-C), number of patients who experienced adverse events, number of patients who withdrew from trials, adverse drug reaction (ADR) profile from Vigibase, long term safety, quality of Life (QoL) assessment and cognitive assessment, especially in adolescents. The Risk ratios (RR) were calculated for these parameters. RESULTS: 24 full text articles were obtained out of a total 421 studies. From these seven double blind randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Perampanel treated patients showed higher 50% responder rates than those treated with placebo. The Risk Ratios (RRs) were 1.39 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.79], 1.83 [95% CI 1.51 - 2.22] and 1.81 [95% CI 1.45-2.27] for the 4 mg per day, 8 mg once daily and 12 mg once daily subgroups of perampanel respectively. The RRs for the seizure freedom rates were 4.52 [95% CI 1.30-15.73], 3.65 [95% CI 1.40-9.52] and 2.14 [95% CI 1.11-4.11] for 4 mg per day, 8 mg once daily and 12 mg once daily subgroups of perampanel respectively. There was a significantly higher risk of TEAEs with the 8 mg and 12 mg doses of perampanel as compared to that with placebo. Number of patients who withdrew from the trials due to adverse events was statistically significant in only the 12 mg subgroup of perampanel in comparison to that with placebo group. CONCLUSION: Perampanel was observed to be an effective add on drug for treating pharmacoresistant focal seizures. The patients achieved higher 50% response rates and freedom from seizures with its use. Tolerability of perampanel was more at lower doses.

Paxlovid: A promising drug for the challenging treatment of SARS-COV-2 in the pandemic era.

Coronavirus infection is a pandemic threat and the most dangerous disease of the 21st century. Despite the rigorous exertion of world-class researchers, there is no perfect cure for it. It has been seen in presently available studies that Paxlovid prevents the progression of diseases and reduces severity in patients tremendously who are at high risk of hospitalization and death. It is a safe oral antiviral drug and has the potential to treat infections from multiple corona variants including omicron which affects humans. Paxlovid is comparatively less expensive than other available effective medicines. Consequently, it reduces hospitalization and death and helps to plummet the economic burden on patients and the health-care system globally. This medicine is still under investigation, and numerous clinical trials are still underway. Its potential side effects are minor and well tolerated by research study participants. Studies show its benefits outweigh the risk, and it is an effective and good alternative for the treatment of coronavirus disease.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Escitalopram versus Desvenlafaxine in Postmenopausal Women with Depression and Anxiety: A Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative Trial.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of escitalopram versus desvenlafaxine in postmenopausal women with depression and anxiety in our study cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, open-label, intention-to-treat, comparative study was conducted over a period of 1 year. Group 1 (n = 20) patients received tablet escitalopram 10 mg once daily orally which was increased to 20 mg/day when needed at the first follow-up. Group 2 (n = 20) patients received tablet desvenlafaxine 50 mg once daily orally which was increased to 100 mg/day when needed at the first follow-up. Patients were followed at 3 and 6 weeks. Primary endpoints were change in baseline scores (recorded as mean ± standard deviation) of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), and safety was also assessed and compared. RESULTS: Forty patients completed the study. Escitalopram was statistically better than desvenlafaxine in reducing depression after 6 weeks of treatment (P < 0.05). Both the drugs were found to be equally effective in treating anxiety. Furthermore, they showed comparable safety and tolerability. CONCLUSION: Escitalopram appears to be more effective on short-term basis in treating depression, and both the drugs appear equally effective in combating anxiety. Furthermore, they appear to be equally safe and well tolerated in postmenopausal women with depression and anxiety.

Digital gangrene induced by inadvertent intra-arterial cocktail injection of anesthetic agents such as pentazocine, promethazine, and atropine: A serious adverse drug experience.

Gangrenous changes in skin due to accidental intra-arterial injection of promethazine and pentazocine have been reported. Accidental intra-arterial injection is most commonly encountered in the antecubital fossa. However, recent reports in the radial and ulnar arteries have also been encountered. We hereby report a serious, preventable adverse drug experience in the form of digital gangrene induced by inadvertent intra-arterial cocktail injection of anesthetic agents such as pentazocine, promethazine, and atropine, which seems to be in the radial artery as the lateral three digits and dorsum of the hand are affected.